« ASNet Updates via RSS/Atom FeedsPosition Statement on Medical Marijuana »

Why Distinguishing between Drug Abuse and Drug Addiction is Important

03/11/09 | by the professor [mail] | Categories: General, Nomenclature

Link: http://AddictionScience.net/ASNabuseAddiction.htm

The terms "drug abuse" and "drug addiction" are often used interchangeably, but in fact, they denote very different conditions. The term "drug abuse" refers to the use of a substance in a manner that deviates from the culturally acceptable norms, while the term "drug addiction" describes a disorder where the drug appears to be the dominant influence on the individual's behavior. More specially, drug addiction is behavioral syndrome where the individual’s motivation is dominated by the procurement and use of a drug and where the normal constraints on the individual’s behavior are largely ineffective (Bozarth, 2009; see also Bozarth, 1990). This condition may or may not be accompanied by physical dependence, but it does seem to be invariably accompanied by psychological dependence. Psychological dependence, however, is NOT equivalent to addiction. Psychological dependence, like its physical dependence counterpart, simply means that the individual requires the substance for normal psychological functioning. That is, abstinence from the substance produces withdrawal reactions that disrupt normal psychological (or in the case of physical dependence, physiological) function. Of course psychological dependence has an underlying neurophysiological basis; therefore the syndrome describing disturbances in normal physiological function other than psychological aspects (such as disturbances in autonomic nervous system producing nausea, chills, tremors, etc.) are better denoted as physical dependence and withdrawal. There are undoubtedly cases of psychological dependence without addiction to the substance—the substance is necessary for ‘normal’ psychological functioning, but the motivation to obtain the substance is insufficiently strong to constitute an addiction to that substance (e.g., daily caffeine use for many people).

There are many cases where the use of a substance constitutes drug abuse but not addiction. For example, any use of an illicit substance is considered drug abuse even if the substance is used only rarely and the individual retains control of their substance use. There are even numerous cases where the individual seems to loose control of their substance use, but it still doesn’t constitute true addiction to that substance (see below). Drug abuse is defined by the society in which it exists; what is considered drug abuse in one culture may be perfectly acceptable in another. Drug abuse does not necessarily imply that the motivation to continue use of the substance is strong.

The causes of drug addiction and of drug abuse are often quite different. Drug addiction, although the more intense motivational condition, is actually less complex than is drug abuse. Drug addiction involves the drug’s action on brain reward and motivation systems whereby it produces neurochemical disturbances that result in the drug becoming the dominant motivational factor for the individual. This involves an “incentive contrast” where there is a dramatic increase in the incentive value or attraction to the drug reward and a marked decrease in the incentive value or interest in other, normal rewards (Bozarth, 2009). The ensuing motivational toxicity is a characteristic of addiction that requires no pre-existing conditions or special personality types—simply the neurochemical action of certain (i.e., addictive) drugs on brain reward systems.

Drug abuse, on the other hand, involves the ‘misuse’ of a substance (according to social norms) that may or may not be accompanied by a strong motivation to continue the use of the substance. In cases where drug abuse appears to be strongly motivated, the motivation actually depends on characteristics of the individual or of the social setting to produce these strong motivational effects. That is, apparent “addictiveness” in cases of strongly motivated drug abuse without addiction does not actually involve an attribute of the drug per se. Rather, some set of psychosocial factors account for the strong motivation to engage in substance abuse. In many cases of pathological drug abuse where the motivation to continue the substance use seems strongly motivated, other psychiatric disturbances are present. These comorbid disorders are much different than actual addiction to the substance and need to be carefully distinguished from true drug addiction when considering the appropriate treatment approach.

There are obviously many cases of drug abuse that do not constitute drug addiction. In contrast, most cases of drug addiction involve drug abuse; however, there are even a few cases where drug addiction does not constitute drug abuse such as prescribed high-dose opiate medication for chronic pain.

Determining whether the use of an illicit substance constitutes simply drug abuse or true drug addiction can seem daunting, but it’s actually quite simple. If the substance use is intensely motivated as is inherent in the definition of addiction AND if the motivation for the substance use arises from its action directly on brain reward systems, it constitutes drug addiction. If special, pre-existing psychosocial factors are necessary for the substance use to develop (regardless of how strongly that behavior seems to be), then it constitutes drug abuse which involves more than just the substance’s action on brain reward systems and therefore is not truly an addiction to that substance. In cases of compulsive drug abuse comorbid disorders are very likely to be present.

Related Topics on the ASNet
A Primer on Drug Addiction
Biological Basis of Addiction
Hard and Soft Drugs
Medical Marijuana

7 comments

Comment from: david [Visitor] Email · http://ixaddict.com
Couldn't agree with you more and I really enjoyed your forum. Wow, very good insight, would you mind if I published your article in the articles section of my new support website at http://ixaddict.com?
09/29/09 @ 17:31
Comment from: the professor [Member] Email
Yes, of course I would be happy to see you reproduce the article on your ixaddict.com website, David. I’m always pleased to see that people find the information useful, and I strive to distribute these ideas to the widest audience possible. Citation of source and/or a link back to the ASNet Forum are always appreciated. Good luck with your venture and thanks for your supporting comment. As I’m sure you’re well aware, positive comments are one of the few external incentives we have for investing the time in writing and posting these articles and the supportive comments are often too few and far between. Of course we register ‘hits’ every time someone ‘lands’ on one of our web pages, but whether or not they find the information useful or encouraging most often remains uncertain.
10/01/09 @ 17:32
Comment from: scarletbegonias [Member] Email
"..however, there are even a few cases where drug addiction does not constitute drug abuse such as prescribed high-dose opiate medication for chronic pain."

Could you explain this more? It seems to me that the motivational strength of addiction to this substance would cause a person to use opiates more than it is suggested for therapeutic use. Although I suppose this kind of addiction may be well hidden from others, it is still looked down upon (although this may be subjective). Is this not characterized as drug abuse because it is not as deviant from social norms as other illicit drugs are? Or perhaps because cultural standards defining drug abuse are null since this type of drug addiction is often well concealed from society (in comparison to heroin addiction, etc..)?
10/04/09 @ 21:59
Comment from: the professor [Member] Email
There are several variations on this theme, but what I had in mind specifically when I wrote this comment was the terminally ill patient under supervised-home or hospice care who is receiving high doses of pain-reliving medication such as methadone or other narcotic analgesics. Adequately medicated, there would be little need for the patient to increase their analgesic usage themselves (hence no explicit drug abuse, viz. they’re only taking the drug as prescribed), but they nonetheless would be likely to have developed a real “drug addiction” meeting the criteria outlined in the other commentaries. Of course this would not present itself as a problem unless their required medication was interrupted for some reason. In the rare case of a miraculous recovery, I suppose treatment for an addiction might be required similar to other cases of addiction, although the comorbidity and other factors common to drug addiction are likely to be largely absent. This scenario would represent an actual case of addiction from medicinal drug use. Other cases of addiction developing from medically prescribed drugs are most often the result of drug abuse whereby the patient increases the frequency or amount of drug beyond the therapeutic regimen prescribed by their physician. In this latter case, yes they are introduced to the potentially addictive drug through therapeutic use, but the development of the addiction requires drug abuse for an addiction to develop. The bottom line is that therapeutically prescribed doses of potentially addictive drugs are usually well below the dosage level that drug abusers seek for their strong psychotropic effects, and hence medicinal drug use is unlikely to produce an addiction, although drug dependence (especially, physical dependence and quite often psychological) could be a troublesome side-effect in some cases.

Finally, brief comment on the prognosis for the miraculously recovered, no-longer terminally ill patient’s possible addiction from therapeutically administered drugs seems appropriate here. They are much more likely to experience a full recovery from their “addiction” than the typical addict because (1) they are much less like to have serious comorbid and other factors that often complicate ‘naturalistic’ drug addiction, (2) their familial and social-support structures are likely to be intact and indeed even better developed in some cases that most people ever experience, and (3) context-dependent conditioning (an important factor in addiction) should be largely negated in the ‘recovered state’ because of the radical change in both external and internal conditions. Of course brain chemistry would remain perturbed by the chronic use of the addictive drug and full recovery of CNS function (e.g., motivational and cognitive features associated with addiction) would take time. But these rare cases would most likely have both medical and personal-support systems that are usually lacking the typical addict along with considerable intrinsic motivation to ‘get life back to normal’ as soon and as fully as possible. The prognosis seems very good for anyone inadvertently “addicted” through medicinal drug use compared with that of the typical drug addict. Indeed, the recovery from their medically induced addiction is likely to not even be labeled as an “addiction,” but rather, just considered part of the patient’s dramatic recovery from a chronic, debilitating illness which unexpectedly abates but still demands rehabilitative measures.

10/08/09 @ 21:38
Comment from: david shields [Visitor] · http://ixaddict.com
Hey,

I need some support on a website with a great cause. Drug addiction awareness is a surfacing issue and I want to mention a fairly new social network support site that offers auto-networking to help group people with similar issues together. website is very powerful and user friendly.

This site is for parents, brothers, cousins, friends, concerned co-workers, employers anyone who knows someone struggling with drug/alcohol addiction or any other addiction for that matter. The website is http://ixaddict.com
10/13/09 @ 05:32
Comment from: scarletbegonias [Member] Email
Thank you very much for your response. I have one further question-- in the case of addiction to opiates occurring in those chronically ill or with chronic pain, is there evidence of motivational toxicity
with continued medicinal use (or can this motivational toxicity only be seen when the drugs are no longer prescribed, in case of recovery)?

Note: I took this question from our email correspondence in case any body else has feedback on the matter
10/19/09 @ 18:21
While I personally do equate drug abuse and drug addiction to the same thing, I do think that the difference between the two is important as well.

For me, I say the two are natuarlly linked because drug addiction is a disorder where it is a dominant influence, and if that's the case, you could consider that as a form of abuse sinec that is taking priority over anything else, at least, that's what I think.
06/13/10 @ 15:02

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.

May 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

An open, unmoderated discussion forum for the Addiction Science Network, promoting free and open exchange of evidence-based information and promoting scientific analysis of drug addiction and related topics.

Search

Addiction Science Network

powered by b2evolution