|
|
||
|
Click here to enter
the Addiction Science Network Discussion Forum |
||
 ©2009 Addiction Science Network |
||
The ASNet Discussion Forum is an open, unmoderated discussion forum for the Addiction Science Network, promoting free and open exchange of evidence-based information and promoting scientific analysis of drug addiction and related topics.
Click here to proceed directly to the ASNet Discussion Forum.| This page
is under construction with most features slowly being added as time
permits. |
| Navigational shortcuts; click the
appropriate link below to jump directly to: |
|||
| Listing by Popularity |
|||
| Listing by Reverse Chronological Order |
|||
| Listing by Design |
|||
| Mini
Tutorials |
Open
Discussions |
Position Statements | General Commentaries |
| Listing by Forum Category |
|||
| E=mc(2) and the Science of Addiction |
|
Laymen and professionals alike often ask for a
quick synopsis of what causes addiction—a succinct summary resolved
down to 25 words or less. The problem is that addiction, like many
behaviors, is far too complex for such a simple rendering that is
easily understood beyond its most superficial context...
|
| Editorial
comment: Frustrated by people demanding a simple explanation
about the causes of drug abuse and addiction? Refer them to this
editorial commentary. |
| Drug
Addiction as a "Disease" |
|
Does considering drug addiction as a "disease" help or hinder a better understanding about the nature, cause, and treatment of this 'disorder?' |
| Editorial
comment: Be sure to read
the last reply from "the Professor" to view the ASNet position on this
issue. |
| Dr. Phil's "Addiction" |
| Dr. Phil and other tele-psychologists promote fundamental misunderstandings about addiction. The inflicted guest is usually told how the problem is easily solved ... |
| Editorial
comment: This
commentary 'takes on' the tele-psychologists such as
"Dr. Phil" who pander to their audiences at the expense of addicts.
Using the 'in-your-face' approach characteristic of these programs, a
few of the obvious faults are discussed in an attempt to mitigate the
negative influence these programs have on the science of addiction. |
| Proposed Regulation of Salvia Divinorum |
|
Salvia Divinorum and its
concentrated extracts are enjoying unrestricted trade on the Internet
and in most states throughout the United States. The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is currently considering whether this substance
(including its concentrated extracts and synthetic analogues) should be
“scheduled” and placed on the controlled substance list. Because there
are no medicinal uses...
|
| Editorial
comment: "Get it while you can," the DEA is close to regulating
this popular recreational substance. |
| Recreational Drug Use: Do People Living in a Free Society have the Right to use Psychotropic Substances "Recreationally"? |
| This post was actually planned for a later date after the groundwork was laid by exploring basic topics regarding drug abuse and addiction on the ASNet Discussion Forum. However, the recent post on Salvia Divinorum (and to a lesser extent the medical marijuana post) propels this topic to the forefront... |
| Editorial
comment: This 'thread' was initiated for reader input and
remains open for discussion. |
|
|
||
|
Click here to enter
the Addiction Science Network Discussion Forum |
||
|
©2009 Addiction Science Network |
||